Kia Cerato 2010 vs Honda Civic 2011
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 126 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Kia Cerato engine produces 1 HP more power than Honda Civic, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Honda Civic. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Kia Cerato 2010 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Cerato is 7 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, 2 cm wider, while the height of Kia Cerato is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 389 litres | |
|
Kia Cerato has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Kia Cerato has 51 litres more trunk space than the Honda Civic. The Honda Civic may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Cerato is 0.4 metres less than that of the Honda Civic, which means Kia Cerato can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
| |