Kia Cerato 2016 vs Mazda 3 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 194 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Kia Cerato is more dynamic to drive. Kia Cerato engine produces 30 HP more power than Mazda 3, but torque is 16 NM less than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Kia Cerato reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 5.6 | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Cerato consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Cerato could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Cerato is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 482 litres | 419 litres | |
|
Kia Cerato has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Kia Cerato has 63 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`760 | 1`835 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |