Kia Cerato 2013 vs Kia RIO 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 123 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Kia Cerato engine produces 7 HP more power than Kia RIO, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Kia RIO. Despite the higher power, Kia Cerato reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.5 | |
| Kia Cerato consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia RIO, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Cerato could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| Kia Cerato gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 19 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Kia Cerato is larger, but slightly lower. Kia Cerato is 19 cm longer than the Kia RIO, 8 cm wider, while the height of Kia Cerato is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 482 litres | 500 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Kia Cerato has 18 litres less trunk space than the Kia RIO. This could mean that the Kia Cerato uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`740 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
| |