Kia Cerato 2009 vs Mazda 3 2009

 
Kia Cerato
2009 - 2013
Mazda 3
2009 - 2011
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 126 HP105 HP
Torque: 156 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12 seconds13.1 seconds
Kia Cerato is more dynamic to drive.
Kia Cerato engine produces 21 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Kia Cerato reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.07.3
Kia Cerato consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Kia Cerato over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 52 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 740 km in combined cycle750 km in combined cycle

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 280'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 3 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 18 years16 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai i30, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIOUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Cerato might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.53 m4.58 m
Width: 1.78 m1.76 m
Height: 1.46 m1.47 m
Both cars are similar in size. Kia Cerato is 5 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Kia Cerato is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data430 litres
Turning diameter: no datano data
Gross weight (kg): no data1`770
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): no data3600
Pros and Cons: Kia Cerato has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Mazda 3 has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv