Kia Cerato 2009 vs Honda Civic 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 126 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Kia Cerato is more dynamic to drive. Kia Cerato engine produces 1 HP more power than Honda Civic, whereas torque is 4 NM more than Honda Civic. Thanks to more power Kia Cerato reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 7.1 | |
| Kia Cerato consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that by driving the Kia Cerato over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| Kia Cerato gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Kia Cerato 2009 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Cerato is 2 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, 3 cm wider, while the height of Kia Cerato is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 389 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
| |