Kia Cerato 2009 vs Kia RIO 2011
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 126 HP | 123 HP | |
Torque: | 156 NM | 155 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
Kia Cerato engine produces 3 HP more power than Kia RIO, whereas torque is 1 NM more than Kia RIO. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.0 | |
The Kia RIO is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Cerato consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia RIO, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Cerato could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 43 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
Kia Cerato gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 19 years | 19 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.53 m | 4.37 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
Kia Cerato is larger, but slightly lower. Kia Cerato is 16 cm longer than the Kia RIO, 8 cm wider, while the height of Kia Cerato is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 500 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 4000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
Kia RIO has
| |