Kia Cerato 2004 vs Hyundai i30 2017
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 143 NM | 242 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Hyundai i30 is a more dynamic driving. Kia Cerato engine produces 35 HP less power than Hyundai i30, whereas torque is 99 NM less than Hyundai i30. Due to the lower power, Kia Cerato reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai i30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Cerato consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Cerato could require 300 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Cerato consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai i30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai Getz, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai Elantra, Kia XCeed | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Cerato might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
| Kia Cerato is 14 cm longer than the Hyundai i30, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Cerato is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 381 litres | 395 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1301 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Kia Cerato has 14 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai i30. This could mean that the Kia Cerato uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Cerato is 0.5 metres less than that of the Hyundai i30, which means Kia Cerato can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`720 | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 15 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
Hyundai i30 has
| |