Kia Cerato 2004 vs Chevrolet Nubira 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 143 NM | 161 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Nubira is a more dynamic driving. Kia Cerato engine produces 17 HP less power than Chevrolet Nubira, whereas torque is 18 NM less than Chevrolet Nubira. Due to the lower power, Kia Cerato reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Kia Cerato consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Nubira, which means that by driving the Kia Cerato over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Kia Cerato consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Nubira. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Cerato is 2 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Nubira, 2 cm wider, while the height of Kia Cerato is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 381 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Cerato is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Nubira. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`720 | 1`193 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
Chevrolet Nubira has
| |