Kia Cerato 2004 vs Toyota Corolla 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 - 143 HP | 90 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 143 - 245 NM | 130 - 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 13 seconds | 10.2 - 12.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 8.3 | 5.9 - 7.9 | |
|
Kia Cerato petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Corolla. On average, Kia Cerato equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.50 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Cerato is 4 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla, 3 cm wider, while the height of Kia Cerato is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 228 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1046 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Cerato is 0.1 metres less than that of the Toyota Corolla. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`783 | ~ 1`225 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |