Kia Cerato 2004 vs Toyota Corolla 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 1.3 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 - 143 HP | 72 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 143 - 245 NM | 120 - 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 13 seconds | 10.2 - 16.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 8.3 | 6.4 - 8.7 | |
|
Kia Cerato petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Corolla. On average, Kia Cerato equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Kia Cerato is larger. Kia Cerato is 7 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla, 5 cm wider, while the height of Kia Cerato is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 228 litres | 372 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1046 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Corolla has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia Cerato has 144 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Corolla. This could mean that the Kia Cerato uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Cerato is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Kia Cerato can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`783 | ~ 1`608 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |