Kia Cerato 2004 vs Nissan Almera 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 1.5 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 - 143 HP | 82 - 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 143 - 245 NM | 136 - 304 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 13 seconds | 9.2 - 14.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 8.3 | 4.8 - 7.8 | |
|
Kia Cerato petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Almera. On average, Kia Cerato equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Kia Cerato is larger. Kia Cerato is 14 cm longer than the Nissan Almera, 3 cm wider, while the height of Kia Cerato is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 228 litres | 355 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1046 litres | 1020 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Kia Cerato has 127 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Almera. This could mean that the Kia Cerato uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Cerato (by 26 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Cerato is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan Almera. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`783 | ~ 1`762 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan Almera has
| |