Kia Cerato 2004 vs Mazda 3 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 1.3 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 - 143 HP | 84 - 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 143 - 245 NM | 122 - 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 13 seconds | 9 - 14.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 8.3 | 5.0 - 8.2 | |
|
On average, the Kia Cerato petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Mazda 3. On average, Kia Cerato equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Kia Cerato is smaller, but slightly higher. Kia Cerato is 11 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Cerato is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 228 litres | 481 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1046 litres | 878 litres | |
| Kia Cerato has 253 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Cerato (by 168 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Cerato is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda 3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`783 | ~ 1`728 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda 3 has
| |