Kia Cerato 2012 vs Mazda 3 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 105 - 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 194 NM | 145 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 9 seconds | 6.1 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 7.2 | 4.3 - 9.6 | |
|
Kia Cerato petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Kia Cerato is larger, but lower. Kia Cerato is 3 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Kia Cerato is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 433 litres | 481 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1360 litres | |
|
Mazda 3 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia Cerato has 48 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. This could mean that the Kia Cerato uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`254 | ~ 1`864 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |