Kia Cerato 2012 vs Kia Cerato 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 126 - 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 194 NM | 157 - 194 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 9 seconds | 9.3 - 11.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 7.2 | 6.7 - 7.8 | |
|
Kia Cerato 2012 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Cerato 2010. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Cerato 2012 is 3 cm longer than the Kia Cerato 2010, width is practically the same , while the height of Kia Cerato 2012 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 433 litres | 440 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Kia Cerato 2012 has 7 litres less trunk space than the Kia Cerato 2010. This could mean that the Kia Cerato 2012 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`254 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
| |