Kia Cerato 2012 vs Kia Ceed 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol) | 1.4 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 90 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 194 NM | 137 - 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 9 seconds | 7.7 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 7.2 | 3.7 - 7.6 | |
|
Kia Cerato petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Ceed. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.31 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.47 m | |
| Kia Cerato is 20 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, width is practically the same , while the height of Kia Cerato is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 433 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1318 litres | |
|
Kia Cerato has more luggage capacity. Kia Cerato has 53 litres more trunk space than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`254 | ~ 1`860 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |