Kia Cerato 2012 vs Jaguar F-Type 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Kia Cerato is available only with front wheel drive, while Jaguar F-Type can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 | 3.0 - 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 340 - 575 HP | |
Torque: | 194 NM | 450 - 700 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 9 seconds | 3.7 - 5.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 7.2 | 8.1 - 11.3 | |
Kia Cerato petrol engines consumes on average 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jaguar F-Type. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.51 m | 4.47 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.92 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.31 m | |
Kia Cerato is 4 cm longer than the Jaguar F-Type, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Cerato is 10 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 433 litres | 408 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 407 litres | |
Kia Cerato has more luggage capacity. Kia Cerato has 25 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar F-Type. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.3 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`254 | ~ 2`063 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 56 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
Jaguar F-Type has
| |