Kia Cerato 2012 vs Ford Mustang 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Kia Cerato is available with front wheel drive, while Ford Mustang can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 | 2.3 - 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 309 - 426 HP | |
| Torque: | 194 NM | 407 - 529 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 7.2 | no data | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Kia Cerato is smaller, but slightly higher. Kia Cerato is 28 cm shorter than the Ford Mustang, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Cerato is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 433 litres | 408 litres | |
|
Kia Cerato has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Kia Cerato has 25 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mustang. The Ford Mustang may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`254 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 27 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
| |