Kia Cerato 2012 vs BMW 4 series 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Kia Cerato is available only with front wheel drive, while BMW 4 series can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 (petrol) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Both cars are available with petrol engines. BMW 4 series is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 150 - 326 HP | |
Torque: | 194 NM | 270 - 630 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 9 seconds | 4.8 - 8.6 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 7.2 | 4.6 - 7.9 | |
On average, the Kia Cerato petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as BMW 4 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.51 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.38 m | |
Kia Cerato is smaller, but slightly higher. Kia Cerato is 13 cm shorter than the BMW 4 series, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Cerato is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 433 litres | 445 litres | |
Kia Cerato has 12 litres less trunk space than the BMW 4 series. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`254 | ~ 2`051 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 17 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
BMW 4 sērija has
| |