Kia Cerato 2012 vs BMW 4 series 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

	Kia Cerato 2012 - 2016	BMW 4 series 2013 - 2017
Gearbox:	Manual/Automatic	Manual/Automatic
Wheel drive type:	Front wheel drive (FWD)	Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
	Kia Cerato is available only with front wheel drive, while BMW 4 series can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines:	2.0 (petrol)	2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel)
Performance
Power:	150 HP	150 - 326 HP
Torque:	194 NM	270 - 630 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	8.5 - 9 seconds	4.8 - 8.6 seconds
	Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	6.9 - 7.2	4.6 - 7.9
	On average, the Kia Cerato petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as BMW 4 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions
Length:	4.51 m	4.64 m
Width:	1.77 m	1.83 m
Height:	1.41 m	1.38 m
	Kia Cerato is smaller, but slightly higher. Kia Cerato is 13 cm shorter than the BMW 4 series, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Cerato is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity:	433 litres	445 litres
	Kia Cerato has 12 litres less trunk space than the BMW 4 series.
Turning diameter:	no data	11.8 meters
Gross weight (kg):	~ 1`254	~ 2`051

Safety:	no data	no data
Quality:	no data	no data
Average price (€):	no data	18 400
Pros and Cons:	Kia Cerato has only petrol engines available	BMW 4 sērija has available with 4x4 drive petrol and diesel engines available
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Kia Cerato 2012 vs BMW 4 series 2013

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions