Kia Cerato 2012 vs BMW 2 series 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Kia Cerato is available only with front wheel drive, while BMW 2 series can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol) | 1.5 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 136 - 340 HP | |
| Torque: | 194 NM | 220 - 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 9 seconds | 4.4 - 8.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 7.2 | 4.4 - 8.1 | |
|
On average, the Kia Cerato petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as BMW 2 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Cerato is 7 cm longer than the BMW 2 series, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 433 litres | 390 litres | |
|
Kia Cerato has more luggage capacity. Kia Cerato has 43 litres more trunk space than the BMW 2 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`254 | ~ 1`923 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
BMW 2 sērija has
| |