Kia Cerato 2010 vs Renault Megane 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol) | 1.2 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 126 - 156 HP | 90 - 256 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 - 194 NM | 151 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 11.8 seconds | 6 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 7.8 | 3.5 - 8.2 | |
|
Kia Cerato petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Megane. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.43 m | |
| Kia Cerato is 18 cm longer than the Renault Megane, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Cerato is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1024 litres | |
|
Kia Cerato has more luggage capacity. Kia Cerato has 63 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.35 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Cerato is 1.15 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Kia Cerato can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`814 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
Renault Megane has
| |