Kia Cerato 2010 vs Mazda 3 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol) | 1.3 - 2.3 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 126 - 156 HP | 84 - 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 - 194 NM | 122 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 11.8 seconds | 6.1 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 7.8 | 4.7 - 9.7 | |
|
Kia Cerato petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.47 m | |
| Kia Cerato is 1 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 1 cm wider, while the height of Kia Cerato is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1285 litres | |
|
Kia Cerato has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Kia Cerato has 27 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Cerato is 0.7 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means Kia Cerato can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`796 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |