Kia Cerato 2010 vs Honda Civic 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol) | 1.3 - 1.8 (petrol, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 126 - 156 HP | 95 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 - 194 NM | 123 - 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 11.8 seconds | 7.5 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 7.8 | 4.6 - 9.8 | |
|
Kia Cerato petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Civic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Cerato and Honda Civic are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1190 litres | |
|
Honda Civic has more luggage space. Kia Cerato has 45 litres less trunk space than the Honda Civic. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Cerato is 0.4 metres less than that of the Honda Civic, which means Kia Cerato can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`679 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
Honda Civic has
| |