Kia Cerato 2016 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol) | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 - 150 HP | 109 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 - 194 NM | 143 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 11.6 seconds | 9.5 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 7.2 | 6.1 - 8.4 | |
|
Kia Cerato petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Lancer. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.49 m | |
| Kia Cerato is 1 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 2 cm wider, while the height of Kia Cerato is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 482 litres | 400 litres | |
|
Kia Cerato has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Kia Cerato has 82 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Lancer. The Mitsubishi Lancer may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Cerato is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means Kia Cerato can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`740 | ~ 1`831 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |