Kia Cerato 2016 vs Mazda 3 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol) | 1.5 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 - 150 HP | 100 - 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 - 194 NM | 144 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 11.6 seconds | 8 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 7.2 | 3.8 - 8.1 | |
|
Kia Cerato petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Cerato is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 482 litres | 419 litres | |
|
Kia Cerato has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Kia Cerato has 63 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`740 | ~ 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |