Kia Cerato 2013 vs Kia Optima 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol) | 1.7 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 - 150 HP | 48 - 278 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 - 194 NM | 180 - 365 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 11.6 seconds | 9.4 - 11.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 7.2 | 5.1 - 8.1 | |
|
Kia Cerato petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Optima. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Kia Cerato is smaller. Kia Cerato is 29 cm shorter than the Kia Optima, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Cerato is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 482 litres | 505 litres | |
|
Kia Optima has more luggage space. Kia Cerato has 23 litres less trunk space than the Kia Optima. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Cerato is 0.6 metres less than that of the Kia Optima, which means Kia Cerato can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`740 | ~ 2`049 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
Kia Optima has
| |