Kia Cerato 2007 vs Kia Cerato 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 - 143 HP | 102 - 143 HP | |
Torque: | 143 - 235 NM | 143 - 245 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 10.4 seconds | 9 - 13 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 - 8.2 | 4.9 - 8.3 | |
Kia Cerato 2007 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Cerato 2004. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.34 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
Kia Cerato 2007 is 14 cm longer than the Kia Cerato 2004, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 345 litres | 228 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1046 litres | |
Kia Cerato 2007 has more luggage capacity. Kia Cerato 2007 has 117 litres more trunk space than the Kia Cerato 2004. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.1 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`314 | ~ 1`783 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2200 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
Kia Cerato has
| |