Kia Cerato 2007 vs Chevrolet Nubira 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.4 - 1.8 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 143 HP | 92 - 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 143 - 235 NM | 131 - 161 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 10.4 seconds | 9.5 - 11.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 - 8.2 | 7.1 - 9.1 | |
|
Kia Cerato petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Nubira. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Cerato is 2 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Nubira, 2 cm wider, while the height of Kia Cerato is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 345 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Cerato is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Nubira. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`314 | ~ 1`181 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
Chevrolet Nubira has
| |