Kia Cerato 2007 vs Alfa Romeo 166 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 143 HP | 150 - 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 143 - 235 NM | 181 - 385 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 10.4 seconds | 7.4 - 9.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 - 8.2 | 7.2 - 13.0 | |
|
Kia Cerato petrol engines consumes on average 3.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Alfa Romeo 166. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Kia Cerato is smaller, but higher. Kia Cerato is 24 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo 166, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Cerato is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 345 litres | 490 litres | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 has more luggage space. Kia Cerato has 145 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 166. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Cerato is 1.5 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 166, which means Kia Cerato can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`314 | ~ 1`931 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
Alfa Romeo 166 has
| |