Kia Cerato 2004 vs BMW 3 series 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Kia Cerato is available only with front wheel drive, while BMW 3 series can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 98 - 143 HP | 122 - 306 HP | |
Torque: | 143 - 245 NM | 160 - 580 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 12.5 seconds | 5.5 - 11.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 8.2 | 4.7 - 9.7 | |
Kia Cerato petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW 3 series. On average, Kia Cerato equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.53 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.42 m | |
Kia Cerato is smaller, but higher. Kia Cerato is 5 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Cerato is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 381 litres | 460 litres | |
BMW 3 series has more luggage space. Kia Cerato has 79 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Cerato is 0.9 metres less than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Kia Cerato can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`791 | ~ 2`023 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1600 | 5800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |