Kia Ceed 2007 vs Seat Ibiza 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Kia Ceed engine produces 38 HP more power than Seat Ibiza, whereas torque is 33 NM more than Seat Ibiza. Thanks to more power Kia Ceed reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Ceed consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Ceed could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Ceed consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Kia Ceed is larger. Kia Ceed is 20 cm longer than the Seat Ibiza, 10 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 292 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 938 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`541 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Seat Ibiza has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Kia Ceed, so Seat Ibiza quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |