Kia Ceed 2007 vs Mazda 3 2009

 
Kia Ceed
2007 - 2010
Mazda 3
2009 - 2011
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 109 HP105 HP
Torque: 140 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.6 seconds12.2 seconds
Kia Ceed is more dynamic to drive.
Kia Ceed engine produces 4 HP more power than Mazda 3, but torque is 5 NM less than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Kia Ceed reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.16.3
Real fuel consumption: 7.4 l/100km7.5 l/100km
By specification Kia Ceed consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Kia Ceed over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Ceed consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
Fuel tank capacity: 53 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 860 km in combined cycle870 km in combined cycle
1010 km on highway1050 km on highway
710 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 300'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 3 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 19 years16 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai i30, Hyundai Accent, Hyundai i20, Kia RIOUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Ceed might be a better choice in this respect.
Kia Ceed 2007 1.4 engine: This engine is generally reliable and rarely causes issues. One of its major concerns is cylinder wall scoring. Early versions were equipped with a large exhaust manifold, but around 2010, it was replaced with a compact catalytic manifold. If the catalytic ...  More about Kia Ceed 2007 1.4 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.25 m4.46 m
Width: 1.79 m1.76 m
Height: 1.45 m1.47 m
Kia Ceed is 21 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 4 cm wider, while the height of Kia Ceed is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 340 litres340 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1360 litres
Turning diameter: no data10.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data1`770
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

high
Mazda 3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 26004200
Pros and Cons: Kia Ceed has
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Mazda 3 has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv