Kia Ceed 2007 vs Fiat Stilo 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 128 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Kia Ceed is more dynamic to drive. Kia Ceed engine produces 14 HP more power than Fiat Stilo, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Fiat Stilo. Thanks to more power Kia Ceed reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Stilo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Kia Ceed consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Stilo, which means that by driving the Kia Ceed over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Kia Ceed consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Stilo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Kia Ceed 2007 1.4 engine: This engine is generally reliable and rarely causes issues.
One of its major concerns is cylinder wall scoring. Early versions were equipped with a large exhaust manifold, but around 2010, it was replaced with a compact catalytic manifold. If the catalytic ... More about Kia Ceed 2007 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Ceed and Fiat Stilo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 370 litres | |
|
Fiat Stilo has more luggage space. Kia Ceed has 30 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Stilo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Kia Ceed has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Stilo has serious deffects in 115 percent more cases than Kia Ceed, so Kia Ceed quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Fiat Stilo has
| |