Kia Ceed 2007 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 78 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Kia Ceed is more dynamic to drive. Kia Ceed engine produces 31 HP more power than Alfa Romeo MiTo, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Alfa Romeo MiTo. Thanks to more power Kia Ceed reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Alfa Romeo MiTo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Ceed consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo MiTo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Ceed could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Ceed consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo MiTo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Ceed gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Kia Ceed 2007 1.4 engine: This engine is generally reliable and rarely causes issues.
One of its major concerns is cylinder wall scoring. Early versions were equipped with a large exhaust manifold, but around 2010, it was replaced with a compact catalytic manifold. If the catalytic ... More about Kia Ceed 2007 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Kia Ceed is larger. Kia Ceed is 19 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo MiTo, 7 cm wider, while the height of Kia Ceed is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 270 litres | |
|
Kia Ceed has more luggage capacity. Kia Ceed has 70 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo MiTo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`560 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Kia Ceed has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Alfa Romeo MiTo, so Kia Ceed quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Alfa Romeo MiTo has
| |