Kia Ceed 2010 vs Renault Clio 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Kia Ceed engine produces 33 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 38 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Kia Ceed reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.4 | |
| Kia Ceed consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Ceed could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 400'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Kia Ceed 2010 2.0 engine: Relatively reliable engine with a large resource. Can have inherent vibrations and is noisier than a typical petrol engine. Spare parts widely available. May have problems with ignition system and temperature ... More about Kia Ceed 2010 2.0 engine Renault Clio 2002 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Clio 2002 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Kia Ceed is larger. Kia Ceed is 45 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 15 cm wider, while the height of Kia Ceed is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 510 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia Ceed has 170 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. This could mean that the Kia Ceed uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Ceed is 0.4 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`780 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Kia Ceed has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 320 percent more cases than Kia Ceed, so Kia Ceed quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Renault Clio has
| |