Kia Ceed 2010 vs Chevrolet Cruze 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Cruze is a more dynamic driving. Kia Ceed engine produces 73 HP less power than Chevrolet Cruze, whereas torque is 125 NM less than Chevrolet Cruze. Due to the lower power, Kia Ceed reaches 100 km/h speed 5.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.5 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Ceed is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Ceed consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Cruze, which means that by driving the Kia Ceed over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Ceed consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Cruze. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1320 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai i30, Kia Cerato | Used also on Chevrolet Orlando | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Ceed might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Kia Ceed is 25 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Cruze, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 419 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Cruze has more luggage space. Kia Ceed has 79 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Cruze. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Ceed is 0.6 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Cruze, which means Kia Ceed can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 1`993 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Kia Ceed has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Cruze has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Kia Ceed, so Kia Ceed quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Chevrolet Cruze has
| |