Kia Ceed 2010 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo 2008
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 126 HP | 78 HP | |
Torque: | 157 NM | 120 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 12 seconds | |
Kia Ceed is more dynamic to drive. Kia Ceed engine produces 48 HP more power than Alfa Romeo MiTo, whereas torque is 37 NM more than Alfa Romeo MiTo. Thanks to more power Kia Ceed reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.9 | |
The Alfa Romeo MiTo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Ceed consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo MiTo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Ceed could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
920 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Kia Ceed 2010 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.26 m | 4.06 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.43 m | |
Kia Ceed is larger. Kia Ceed is 20 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo MiTo, 7 cm wider, while the height of Kia Ceed is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 270 litres | |
Kia Ceed has more luggage capacity. Kia Ceed has 70 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo MiTo. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Ceed is 0.7 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo MiTo, which means Kia Ceed can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | 1`560 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | low | |
Kia Ceed has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo MiTo has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Kia Ceed, so Kia Ceed quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2400 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Alfa Romeo MiTo has
| |