Kia Ceed 2010 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is a more dynamic driving. Kia Ceed engine produces 5 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, but torque is 12 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. Due to the lower power, Kia Ceed reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Colt is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Kia Ceed consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that by driving the Kia Ceed over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Kia Ceed consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Ceed gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 3.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Kia Ceed is larger, but lower. Kia Ceed is 32 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 10 cm wider, while the height of Kia Ceed is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1032 litres | |
|
Kia Ceed has more luggage capacity. Kia Ceed has 120 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Ceed is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Kia Ceed can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`460 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |