Kia Ceed 2010 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 78 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Kia Ceed engine produces 12 HP more power than Alfa Romeo MiTo, whereas torque is 17 NM more than Alfa Romeo MiTo. Despite the higher power, Kia Ceed reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Alfa Romeo MiTo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Kia Ceed consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo MiTo, which means that by driving the Kia Ceed over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Kia Ceed consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo MiTo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Ceed gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Kia Ceed is larger. Kia Ceed is 20 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo MiTo, 7 cm wider, while the height of Kia Ceed is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 270 litres | |
|
Kia Ceed has more luggage capacity. Kia Ceed has 70 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo MiTo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Ceed is 0.7 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo MiTo, which means Kia Ceed can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`560 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Kia Ceed has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo MiTo has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Kia Ceed, so Kia Ceed quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Alfa Romeo MiTo has
| |