Kia Ceed 2013 vs Hyundai i30 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Kia Ceed is more dynamic to drive. Kia Ceed engine produces 84 HP more power than Hyundai i30, whereas torque is 109 NM more than Hyundai i30. Thanks to more power Kia Ceed reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai i30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Ceed consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Ceed could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Ceed consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai i30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 250'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hyundai i30 2013 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.31 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.47 m | |
| Kia Ceed is 1 cm longer than the Hyundai i30, width is practically the same , while the height of Kia Ceed is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 378 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1316 litres | |
| Kia Ceed has 2 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.34 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Ceed is 0.26 metres less than that of the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Kia Ceed has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Hyundai i30, so Kia Ceed quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Hyundai i30 has
| |