Kia Ceed 2007 vs Renault Megane 2010
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
|
Kia Ceed is more dynamic to drive. Kia Ceed engine produces 16 HP more power than Renault Megane. Thanks to more power Kia Ceed reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.5 | |
|
The Kia Ceed is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Ceed consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that by driving the Kia Ceed over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 534 litres | 368 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1664 litres | no data | |
|
Kia Ceed has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Kia Ceed has 166 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane. The Renault Megane may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`840 | 1`755 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Renault Megane has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Renault Megane, so Renault Megane quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Renault Megane has
| |