Kia Ceed 2007 vs Ford Focus 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Kia Ceed is more dynamic to drive. Kia Ceed engine produces 2 HP less power than Ford Focus, but torque is 1 NM more than Ford Focus. Despite less power, Kia Ceed reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Kia Ceed consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus, which means that by driving the Kia Ceed over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Kia Ceed consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 400'000 km | 470'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford Focus engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Ford Mondeo, Ford C-Max | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Ceed might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Kia Ceed 2007 2.0 engine: Relatively reliable engine with a large resource. Can have inherent vibrations and is noisier than a typical petrol engine. Spare parts widely available. May have problems with ignition system and temperature ... More about Kia Ceed 2007 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.50 m | |
| Kia Ceed and Ford Focus are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 534 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1664 litres | 1525 litres | |
|
Kia Ceed has more luggage capacity. Kia Ceed has 31 litres more trunk space than the Ford Focus. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Ceed (by 139 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 1`895 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Kia Ceed has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Focus has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Kia Ceed, so Kia Ceed quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Ford Focus has
| |