Kia Ceed 2007 vs Volvo V50 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 255 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Volvo V50 is a more dynamic driving. Kia Ceed engine produces 21 HP less power than Volvo V50, whereas torque is 85 NM less than Volvo V50. Due to the lower power, Kia Ceed reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Ceed is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Ceed consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that by driving the Kia Ceed over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Ceed consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1080 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1230 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Ceed gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.45 m | |
| Kia Ceed is 4 cm shorter than the Volvo V50, 2 cm wider, while the height of Kia Ceed is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 534 litres | 417 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1664 litres | 1307 litres | |
|
Kia Ceed has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Kia Ceed has 117 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V50. The Volvo V50 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Ceed (by 357 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`920 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Volvo V50 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Kia Ceed, so Volvo V50 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |