Kia Ceed 2007 vs Volvo V50 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 255 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Kia Ceed is more dynamic to drive. Kia Ceed engine produces 5 HP more power than Volvo V50, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Volvo V50. Thanks to more power Kia Ceed reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V50 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Kia Ceed consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that by driving the Kia Ceed over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Kia Ceed consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1080 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 1230 km on highway | 1440 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.46 m | |
| Kia Ceed is 5 cm shorter than the Volvo V50, 2 cm wider, while the height of Kia Ceed is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 534 litres | 417 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1664 litres | no data | |
|
Kia Ceed has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Kia Ceed has 117 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V50. The Volvo V50 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`920 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Volvo V50 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volvo V50, so Volvo V50 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |