Kia Ceed 2009 vs Renault Megane 2009
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 143 HP | 180 HP | |
Torque: | 186 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 8 seconds | |
Renault Megane is a more dynamic driving. Kia Ceed engine produces 37 HP less power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 114 NM less than Renault Megane. Due to the lower power, Kia Ceed reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
The Renault Megane is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Kia Ceed consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that by driving the Kia Ceed over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Kia Ceed consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
910 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
560 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 15 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Grand Espace | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Renault Megane engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Kia Ceed 2009 2.0 engine: Relatively reliable engine with a large resource. Can have inherent vibrations and is noisier than a typical petrol engine. Spare parts widely available. May have problems with ignition system and temperature ... More about Kia Ceed 2009 2.0 engine Renault Megane 2009 2.0 engine: This engine offers a respectable lifespan for a turbocharged motor but comes with several recurring issues that demand attention. One common problem is oil consumption, which can result from hardened valve seals or, in later ... More about Renault Megane 2009 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.49 m | 4.56 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.53 m | 1.47 m | |
Kia Ceed is smaller, but higher. Kia Ceed is 7 cm shorter than the Renault Megane, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Ceed is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 534 litres | 524 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1595 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Kia Ceed has 10 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane. The Renault Megane may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Ceed is 0.6 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Kia Ceed can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`890 | 1`884 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Kia Ceed has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Megane, so Kia Ceed quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 3800 | 3600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Renault Megane has
| |