Kia Ceed 2009 vs Kia Ceed 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 255 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Kia Ceed 2012 is a more dynamic driving. Kia Ceed 2009 engine produces 13 HP less power than Kia Ceed 2012, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Kia Ceed 2012. Due to the lower power, Kia Ceed 2009 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
| By specification Kia Ceed 2009 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed 2012, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Ceed 2009 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai i30, Kia Cerato | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Hyundai i30, Hyundai Accent, Kia Venga | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Ceed 2012 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.49 m | |
| Kia Ceed 2009 is 2 cm shorter than the Kia Ceed 2012, 1 cm wider, while the height of Kia Ceed 2009 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 534 litres | 528 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1664 litres | 1642 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Kia Ceed 2009 has 6 litres more trunk space than the Kia Ceed 2012. The Kia Ceed 2012 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Ceed 2009 (by 22 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Ceed 2009 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Kia Ceed 2012. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`920 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |