Kia Ceed 2009 vs Peugeot 5008 2009
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 126 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 5008 is a more dynamic driving. Kia Ceed engine produces 30 HP less power than Peugeot 5008, whereas torque is 83 NM less than Peugeot 5008. Due to the lower power, Kia Ceed reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 7.9 | |
|
The Kia Ceed is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Ceed consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 5008, which means that by driving the Kia Ceed over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai i30, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 207, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 Picasso, Peugeot 3008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Ceed might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Peugeot 5008 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Kia Ceed 2009 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Kia Ceed is smaller. Kia Ceed is 4 cm shorter than the Peugeot 5008, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Ceed is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 534 litres | 679 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 679 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 534 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1664 litres | 1754 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 5008 (by 90 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Ceed is 0.8 metres less than that of the Peugeot 5008, which means Kia Ceed can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`840 | 2`250 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Kia Ceed has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 5008, so Kia Ceed quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Peugeot 5008 has
| |