Kia Ceed 2009 vs Kia Ceed 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 126 HP | 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 NM | 164 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Kia Ceed 2012 is a more dynamic driving. Kia Ceed 2009 engine produces 9 HP less power than Kia Ceed 2012, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Kia Ceed 2012. Due to the lower power, Kia Ceed 2009 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Ceed 2012 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Ceed 2009 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed 2012, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Ceed 2009 could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Ceed 2009 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed 2012. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Kia Ceed 2012 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai i30, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai i30 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Ceed 2009 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Kia Ceed 2009 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low. Kia Ceed 2012 1.6 engine: The engine is generally a reliable design and not particularly sensitive to fuel quality. However, it is prone to several common issues. One of the most widespread problems is the rapid buildup of carbon ... More about Kia Ceed 2012 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.49 m | |
| Kia Ceed 2009 is 2 cm shorter than the Kia Ceed 2012, 1 cm wider, while the height of Kia Ceed 2009 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 534 litres | 528 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1664 litres | no data | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Kia Ceed 2009 has 6 litres more trunk space than the Kia Ceed 2012. The Kia Ceed 2012 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Ceed 2009 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Kia Ceed 2012. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`840 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |