Kia Ceed 2012 vs Volvo V50 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 128 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
| Kia Ceed engine produces 18 HP more power than Volvo V50, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Volvo V50. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V50 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Ceed consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Ceed could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Ceed consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1440 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V50 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 320'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo V50 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Hyundai i30, Hyundai Accent, Kia Venga | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo S40, Volvo C30 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Ceed might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Ceed is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo V50, 1 cm wider, while the height of Kia Ceed is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 528 litres | 417 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1642 litres | no data | |
|
Kia Ceed has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Kia Ceed has 111 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V50. The Volvo V50 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Ceed is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo V50, which means Kia Ceed can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Volvo V50 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volvo V50, so Volvo V50 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 3600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 6.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |