Kia Ceed 2012 vs Kia Ceed 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 128 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 255 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Kia Ceed 2012 is more dynamic to drive. Kia Ceed 2012 engine produces 13 HP more power than Kia Ceed 2009, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Kia Ceed 2009. Thanks to more power Kia Ceed 2012 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
| By specification Kia Ceed 2012 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed 2009, which means that by driving the Kia Ceed 2012 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Hyundai i30, Hyundai Accent, Kia Venga | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai i30, Kia Cerato | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Ceed 2012 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.53 m | |
| Kia Ceed 2012 is 2 cm longer than the Kia Ceed 2009, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Ceed 2012 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 528 litres | 534 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1642 litres | 1664 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Kia Ceed 2012 has 6 litres less trunk space than the Kia Ceed 2009. This could mean that the Kia Ceed 2012 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Ceed 2009 (by 22 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Ceed 2012 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Kia Ceed 2009. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 1`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |