Kia Ceed 2012 vs Kia Ceed 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 HP | 126 HP | |
| Torque: | 164 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Kia Ceed 2012 is more dynamic to drive. Kia Ceed 2012 engine produces 9 HP more power than Kia Ceed 2009, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Kia Ceed 2009. Thanks to more power Kia Ceed 2012 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Ceed 2012 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Ceed 2012 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed 2009, which means that by driving the Kia Ceed 2012 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Ceed 2012 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed 2009. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Kia Ceed 2012 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai i30 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai i30, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Ceed 2009 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Kia Ceed 2012 1.6 engine: The engine is generally a reliable design and not particularly sensitive to fuel quality. However, it is prone to several common issues. One of the most widespread problems is the rapid buildup of carbon ... More about Kia Ceed 2012 1.6 engine Kia Ceed 2009 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.53 m | |
| Kia Ceed 2012 is 2 cm longer than the Kia Ceed 2009, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Ceed 2012 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 528 litres | 534 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1642 litres | 1664 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Kia Ceed 2012 has 6 litres less trunk space than the Kia Ceed 2009. This could mean that the Kia Ceed 2012 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Ceed 2009 (by 22 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Ceed 2012 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Kia Ceed 2009. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`820 | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |